Retrospective outcome analysis of one-stage penile urethroplasty using a flap or graft in a homogeneous series of patients

75Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of a one-stage penile flap or graft urethroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients had a penile urethroplasty using one-stage techniques; 18 (29%) had a one-stage flap urethroplasty and 45 (71%) a one-stage urethroplasty using skin (23) or oral mucosal (22) grafts. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any instrumentation was needed after surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 55 months; of the 63 procedures, 48 (76%) were successful and 15 (24%) failures. Of 18 patients who had a one-stage flap urethroplasty, 12 (67%) were successful and six (33%) were failures; of the 45 who had one-stage graft urethroplasty, 36 (80%) were successful and nine (20%) were failures; of 23 penile skin grafts, 18 (78%) were successful and five (22%) were failures; and of 22 oral mucosal grafts, 18 (82%) were successful and four (18%) were failures. CONCLUSIONS: The use of grafts for one-stage penile urethroplasty gave a higher success rate (80%) than flaps (67%). The difference in the success rate between oral mucosal grafts (82%) and skin grafts (78%) was not clinically significant. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbagli, G., Morgia, G., & Lazzeri, M. (2008). Retrospective outcome analysis of one-stage penile urethroplasty using a flap or graft in a homogeneous series of patients. BJU International, 102(7), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07741.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free