Comparative effect of low-glycemic index versus high-glycemic index breakfasts on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effect of High-Glycemic Index (GI) versus Low-GI breakfasts on cognitive functions, including memory and attention, of children and adolescents. We systematically searched the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science databases, from their inception until June 2019. Articles comparing the effect of Low-GI versus High-GI breakfasts on the cognitive function (i.e., immediate memory, delayed memory, and attention) of children and adolescents were included. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to compute the pooled effect sizes (ESs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled ESs were 0.13 (95% CI: −0.11, 0.37) for immediate memory and 0.07 (95% CI: −0.15, 0.28) for delayed memory. For attention, the pooled ES was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.27, 0.26). In summary, GI breakfasts do not affect cognitive domains in children and adolescents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Álvarez-Bueno, C., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., López, E. J., Visier-Alfonso, M. E., Redondo-Tébar, A., & Cavero-Redondo, I. (2019). Comparative effect of low-glycemic index versus high-glycemic index breakfasts on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free