Abstract
Risk assessment and management is an integral part of modern clinical practice. In this article we discuss best practice in the assessment and management of risk of harm to others. Unstructured clinical judgement methods have been used for many years, but it is only more recently that actuarial and structured clinical judgement methods have been introduced. These methods are discussed and compared. We describe a process that could be followed by a clinical team and give an illustrative case example. Last, we reflect on aspects of current practice and consider the possible direction of developments in the field.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Baird, J., & Stocks, R. (2013). Risk assessment and management: Forensic methods, human results. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 19(5), 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.111.009407
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.