Abstract
A language impairment that affects the production of inflected and/or derived words may result from a deficit that specifically affects morphological processing mechanisms, but it might also arise from whole-word processing failures as well (Badecker and Caramazza, 1987; Funnell, 1987). However, to motivate a true morphological impairment, the deficit must be understood in terms of one or more different levels of morphological structure. Minimally, we can distinguish a word's morphosyntactic representation from its morphophonological representation. In the single- case study reported here a deficit affecting the representation or processing of morphosyntactic representations is motivated. A critical part of the argument is that the deficit affects both regular and irregular inflection, and that no whole-word processing deficit can account for the particular pattern observed in this patient.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Badecker, W. (1997). Levels of morphological deficit: Indications from inflectional regularity. Brain and Language, 60(3), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1845
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.