Tendency to angry rumination predicts stress-provoked endothelin-1 increase in patients with coronary artery disease

28Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a tendency to angry rumination predicts anger recall (AR) stress-provoked increase in endothelin (ET)-1 among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Patients with chronic stable CHD (n = 105) completed a five-item measure of tendency to angry rumination (DAB-VR) and underwent a laboratory AR stress protocol (15-minute resting baseline [BL], 8-minute AR). Blood samples drawn at end of BL and AR were assayed for ET-1. Change in ET-1 from BL to AR (increase versus decrease/no change) was treated dichotomously in multivariate logistic regression models, including DAB-VR score and potential confounders, to evaluate the contribution of DAB-VR to the prediction of change in ET-1. RESULTS: In the multivariate model, DAB-VR score significantly predicted ET-1 increase (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.1.63; p =.004), controlling for age, history of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, rate pressure product, use of β blockers, and statins. CONCLUSIONS: A tendency to angry rumination independently predicted AR stress-provoked ET-1 increase among patients with CHD. Given the involvement of ET-1 in plaque rupture, anger rumination tendency may identify vulnerability to anger-triggered acute coronary syndrome through prolongation of initial anger mobilization. The contribution of ruminative thinking to sustained poststress ET-1 elevation and the synergistic relationship of ET-1 during emotional stress with norepinephrine and nitric oxide remain to be explored. © 2010 by the American Psychosomatic Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernandez, A. B., Soufer, R., Collins, D., Soufer, A., Ranjbaran, H., & Burg, M. M. (2010). Tendency to angry rumination predicts stress-provoked endothelin-1 increase in patients with coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(4), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d71982

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free