Abstract
The focus of the present study is on the allocation of responsibilities for addressing environmental risks in transboundary water governance. Effective environmental management in transboundary situations requires coordinated and cooperative action among diverse individuals and organizations. Currently, little insight exists on how to foster collective action such that individuals and organizations take the responsibility to address transboundary environmental risks. On the basis of 4 cases of transboundary water governance, it will be shown how certain allocation principles are more likely to encourage cooperative action. The main lesson from these case studies is that the allocation of responsibilities should be seen as a risk distribution problem, including considerations of effectiveness, efficiency, and fairness. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:371–375. © 2016 SETAC.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Doorn, N. (2017). Allocating responsibility for environmental risks: A comparative analysis of examples from water governance. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 13(2), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1799
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.