Reproducible MRI measurement of adipose tissue volumes in genetic and dietary rodent obesity models

19Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To develop ratio MRI [lipid/(lipid+water)] methods for assessing lipid depots and compare measurement variability with biological differences among lean controls (spontaneously hypertensive rats [SHRs]), dietary obese rats (SHR-DOs), and genetic/dietary obese rats (SHROBs). Materials and Methods: Images with and without chemical shift-selective (CHESS) water suppression were processed using a semiautomatic method that accounts for relaxometry, chemical shift, receive coil sensitivity, and partial volume. Results: Partial volume correction improved results by 10% to 15%. Over six operators, volume variation was reduced to 1.9 mL from 30.6 mL for single-image-analysis with intensity inhomogeneity. For three acquisitions on the same animal, volume reproducibility was <1%. SHROBs had six times more visceral and eight times more subcutaneous adipose tissue than SHRs. SHR-DOs had enlarged visceral depots (three times larger than those in SHRs), SHROBs had significantly more subcutaneous adipose tissue, indicating a strong genetic component to this fat depot. Liver ratios in SHR-DO and SHROB were higher than in SHR, indicating elevated fat content. Among SHROBs, evidence suggested a phenotype SHROB* having elevated liver ratios and visceral adipose tissue volumes. Conclusion: Effects of diet and genetics on obesity were significantly larger than variations due to image acquisition and analysis, indicating that these methods can be used to assess accumulation/depletion of lipid depots in animal models of obesity. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, D. H., Flask, C. A., Ernsberger, P. R., Wong, W. C. K., & Wilson, D. L. (2008). Reproducible MRI measurement of adipose tissue volumes in genetic and dietary rodent obesity models. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 28(4), 915–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21481

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free