Counting-based search: Branching heuristics for constraint satisfaction problems

52Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Designing a search heuristic for constraint programming that is reliable across problem domains has been an important research topic in recent years. This paper concentrates on one family of candidates: counting-based search. Such heuristics seek to make branching decisions that preserve most of the solutions by determining what proportion of solutions to each individual constraint agree with that decision. Whereas most generic search heuristics in constraint programming rely on local information at the level of the individual variable, our search heuristics are based on more global information at the constraint level. We design several algorithms that are used to count the number of solutions to specic families of constraints and propose some search heuristics exploiting such information. The experimental part of the paper considers eight problem domains ranging from well-established benchmark puzzles to rostering and sport scheduling. An initial empirical analysis identies heuristic maxSD as a robust candidate among our proposals. We then evaluate the latter against the state of the art, including the latest generic search heuristics, restarts, and discrepancy-based tree traversals. Experimental results show that counting-based search generally outperforms other generic heuristics. © 2012 AI Access Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilles, G. P., Quimper, C. G., & Zanarini, A. (2012). Counting-based search: Branching heuristics for constraint satisfaction problems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 43, 173–210. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3463

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free