Hobbesian hierarchy: The political economy of political organization

29Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hierarchy is a nearly ubiquitous form of political organization. This article examines the concept of hierarchy and addresses three questions. What is hierarchy? When is it selected? Why does it matter? I outline and make explicit a theoretical approach common to the disparate literatures on political parties, domestic structures, and international relations. Drawn from the theory of the firm in economics, this relational contracting approach focuses on how hierarchy reduces transaction costs and safeguards specific assets, and it explains the nature and persistence of hierarchy and why it develops in some strategic settings and not others. Relational contracting theory has clear limitations, however, whose gaps are highlighted and sometimes filled by alternative approaches to understanding hierarchy. Integrating relational contracting theory with these alternatives promises a more complete approach. Copyright © 2009 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lake, D. A. (2009). Hobbesian hierarchy: The political economy of political organization. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.041707.193640

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free