Modern Scepticism, Metaphysics, and Absolute Knowing in Hegel's Science of Logic

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While there are good reasons to think that Hegel would not engage with modern scepticism in the Science of Logic, this article argues that he nevertheless does so in a way that informs the text's conception of logic as the latter pertains to metaphysics. Hegel engages with modern scepticism's general concerns that philosophy should begin without unexamined presuppositions and should come to attain not only knowledge of truth, but corresponding second-order knowledge: knowledge of knowing truth. These concerns inform two needs that Hegel formulates for first philosophy, which logic - by unifying with metaphysics, which is traditionally synonymous with first philosophy - is to satisfy. However, logic, for the Logic, is unified with metaphysics as a science of absolute knowing, the form of thinking involved in traditional metaphysics. As such, logic, for the Logic, is neither anti-metaphysical nor reducible to metaphysics, but is rather a science of metaphysical thinking, which, for Hegel, includes metaphysics. The article emphasizes how Hegel's construal of logic as a science of absolute knowing avoids running into the 'swimming problem' that Hegel raises against, broadly, epistemological forms of first philosophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Engelman, R. (2024). Modern Scepticism, Metaphysics, and Absolute Knowing in Hegel’s Science of Logic. Hegel Bulletin, 45(3), 442–469. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2022.39

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free