Abstract
This Article contains an error in the Results section under the subheading 'Performance comparison among call methods using simulation data'. We found that when the insertions were ?2 bp length and contained repetitive sequence from the flanking region, de novo assembly (Inchworm) did not work well (Table S3)." should read: We found that when the insertions were ?25 bp length and contained repetitive sequence from the flanking region, de novo assembly (Inchworm) did not work well (Table S3).".
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shigemizu, D., Miya, F., Akiyama, S., Okuda, S., Boroevich, K. A., Fujimoto, A., … Tsunoda, T. (2018, December 1). Publisher Correction: IMSindel: An accurate intermediate-size indel detection tool incorporating de novo assembly and gapped global-local alignment with split read analysis (Scientific Reports (2018) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23978-z). Scientific Reports. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28698-y
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.