Efficacy and safety of second-generation CAR T-cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A meta-analysis

31Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), representing 30% of all lymphoma cases. Within the first 2-3 years following immunochemotherapy, 30-40% of patients will experience a relapse or a refractory disease, thereby exhibiting a poor prognosis. High-dose immunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard care for relapsed/refractory (RR) patients with DLBCL. However, >60% of patients are ineligible for a transplant, presenting a therapeutic challenge. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promising efficacy in patients with DLBCL, including those with R/R disease. The present study conducted a meta-analysis that showed highly favorable outcomes [objective response rate (ORR): 69%; complete remission (CR): 49%] in B-cell NHL patients (n=419) who were treated with second-generation CAR T cells. The response rate varied in different types of B-cell NHL. In 306 patients with R/R DLBCL eligible for rate evaluation, the ORR and CR rate mean estimates were 68% [95% confidence interval (CI), 55-79%] and 46% (95% CI, 38-54%), respectively. Thus, the findings indicated that immunotherapy with CAR T cells has improved outcomes for patients with R/R DLBCL and other subtypes of B-cell NHL compared with standard chemotherapy regimens. The study revealed that grade ≥3 anemia (34%) and thrombocytopenia (30%) were the most common adverse effects of CAR T-cell therapy. Incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity associated with CAR T-cell therapy was effectively managed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Mansour, M., Al-Foheidi, M., & Ibrahim, E. (2020). Efficacy and safety of second-generation CAR T-cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A meta-analysis. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 13(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free