A comparison of surgical outcomes between pre-and full-term patients with exotropia

3Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose To compare the surgical outcomes between pre- and full-term patients with exotropia and to examine the factors associated with surgical outcomes. Methods This retrospective study included 48 pre- and 432 full-term patients with basic-type exotropia who underwent unilateral or bilateral lateral rectus muscle (ULR or BLR) recession. Preoperative characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between the pre- and full-term infants. Additionally, factors affecting the surgical outcomes were evaluated in all patients. Results The preoperative characteristics were significantly different between the pre- and full-term groups in terms of neurodevelopmental disabilities (p = 0.020). There were no significant differences between the pre- and full-term groups in terms of the success, overcorrection, and recurrence rates after the mean follow-up period of 34.6 ± 13.9 months (p = 0.697). The major cause of surgical failure was recurrence in both groups. Pre-term birth was not a risk factor for overcorrection and recurrence. However, regardless of the pre- or full-term birth status, the presence of neurodevelopmental disabilities significantly affected final overcorrection (p = 0.004). Conclusions Pre-term patients with exotropia showed similar surgical outcomes to full-term controls. The presence of neurodevelopmental disabilities was a risk factor for final overcorrection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jung, E. H., Yu, Y. S., & Kim, S. J. (2018). A comparison of surgical outcomes between pre-and full-term patients with exotropia. PLoS ONE, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208848

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free