The MDS-UPDRS Part II (motor experiences of daily living) resulted useful for assessment of disability in Parkinson's disease

71Citations
Citations of this article
143Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the motor experiences of daily living section of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS M-EDL) for assessing disability in PD patients; to determine the association between disability and quality of life; and to identify cut-off score ranges for no, mild, moderate and severe disability with this measure. Methods: International, observational, cross-sectional study of 435 PD patients, assessed with: MDS-UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr staging, Rapid Assessment of Disability Scale, Clinical Impression of Severity Index for PD, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 and EQ-5D. Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons, ordinal logistic regression analysis for setting cut-off values and a step-wise multiple linear regression model were calculated. Results: MDS-UPDRS M-EDL correlated 0.70-0.80 with other disability measures, and-0.46 to 0.74 with quality of life scales. Scores significantly increased with higher disease duration and severity (p<0.001). Cut-off values for the M-EDL were: 0-2 points, no disability; 3-16, mild; 17-31, moderate; and 32 points or more, severe. Linear regression analysis identified the MDS-UPDRS nM-EDL section as the main determinant of M-EDL, followed by the rest of MDS-UPDRS sections (explained variance: 59%). Conclusions: MDS-UPDRS M-EDL proved to be useful for assessing disability in PD. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez-Blazquez, C., Rojo-Abuin, J. M., Alvarez-Sanchez, M., Arakaki, T., Bergareche-Yarza, A., Chade, A., … Martinez-Martin, P. (2013). The MDS-UPDRS Part II (motor experiences of daily living) resulted useful for assessment of disability in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 19(10), 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.05.017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free