Discovering meaning-making in a child custody context: The combined benefits of using Van Manen’s phenomenology and a critical lens

0Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Phenomenology as a methodology reveals lived experience (van Manen, 2017); as such, it is an excellent methodology to help us understand the parent perceptions and experiences of child custody decision-making. Qualitative researchers have explored the ways in which lived experience is influenced by issues of culture and gender (Kall & Zeiler, 2014). In this paper, I explain how the key tenets of phenomenology, epoché and reduction, revealed the importance of custody status for participants, and also discuss how differences in gender was rendered invisible in the initial analysis. The flexible nature of phenomenology allowed me to use a critical lens after the initial analysis to consider another understanding of the parent experience, while still revealing lived experience. These new understandings better position us for social justice work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Archer-Kuhn, B. (2018). Discovering meaning-making in a child custody context: The combined benefits of using Van Manen’s phenomenology and a critical lens. Qualitative Report, 23(8), 1822–1835. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free