Sulfate Additives Cut Methane Emissions More Effectively at Lower Liquid Manure Storage Temperatures

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reducing methane (CH4) emissions from dairy farms is a key objective in limiting total greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock industry. Reducing CH4 emissions from manure storage using additives may provide an achievable near-term contribution to this long-term goal in alignment with the International Dairy Federation’s initiative on pathways to net zero. Sulfate-based H2SO4 and the sulfate-containing nonacid CaSO4 have effectively suppressed methane emissions in lab studies at a single temperature. The present study analyzes the effect of temperature on the efficacy of these two additives, bridging the gap between common laboratory conditions and average on-farm temperature. We found superior cumulative suppression, higher peak suppression, and longer duration of high-end suppression at lower temperatures when comparing controls to additive experiments at 24, 21, and 18 °C over 120 days. Peak mitigation increased as temperature decreased, culminating at 82.9% and 57.6% for H2SO4 and CaSO4, respectively, at 18 °C. Additives remained effective for longer at lower temperatures, with H2SO4 maintaining ≥70% peak mitigation (PM) for 102 days at 18 °C, but only 48 days at 24 °C; CaSO4 retained ≥70% PM for 87 days at 18 °C, but only 38 days at 24 °C. PM for each additive occurs at similar thermal times, despite appearing different at conventional times. Our analysis creates a link between the efficacy of CH4 mitigation and local temperatures, which can be related to cumulative heat (thermal time/degree-days) to establish site-specific guidance for CH4 mitigation protocols.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matos Pereira Lima, F., Laniel, M., Baldé, H., Gordon, R., & VanderZaag, A. (2025). Sulfate Additives Cut Methane Emissions More Effectively at Lower Liquid Manure Storage Temperatures. ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, 5(4), 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00659

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free