Participants' evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: Are findings based on different datasets consistent?

50Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Subjective outcome evaluation findings based on the perspective of the participants of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes) in nine datasets collected from 2005 to 2009 (n = 206, 313 program participants) were examined in this paper. Based on the consolidated data with schools as units, results showed that the participants generally had positive perceptions of the program, implementers, and benefits of the program. More than four-fifths of the participants regarded the program as beneficial to their holistic development. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the perceived qualities of the program and the program implementers predicted perceived effectiveness of the program. Based on the subjective outcome evaluation findings, the present study provides support for the effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. Copyright 2012 Daniel T. L. Shek and Rachel C. F. Sun.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shek, D. T. L., & Sun, R. C. F. (2012). Participants’ evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: Are findings based on different datasets consistent? The Scientific World Journal, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/187450

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free