Stepping back from the guidelines: Where do we stand?

15Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The third edition of the autophagy guidelines is now published. This turned out to be a major undertaking in part because of the tremendous increase in the number of researchers participating in autophagy studies, and hence in revising the guidelines. First, I cannot emphasize enough that this paper represents a true community effort—it would simply not be possible for one person to generate such an in-depth and up-to-date manuscript covering this diverse range of topics in the autophagy field. Second, it is of critical importance that this paper indeed does not represent the opinions of a single individual, but rather seeks to obtain a consensus opinion regarding the best methods to monitor autophagy and interpret the results of the corresponding experiments. So, thank you to all who have contributed to the latest version.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klionsky, D. J. (2016, January 1). Stepping back from the guidelines: Where do we stand? Autophagy. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1139264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free