Comparative effectiveness research: Alternatives to "traditional" computed tomography use in the acute care setting

16Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is an essential diagnostic tool and has revolutionized care of patients in the acute care setting. However, there is widespread agreement that overutilization of CT, where benefits do not exceed possible costs or harms, is occurring. The goal was to seek consensus in identifying and prioritizing research questions and themes that involve the comparative effectiveness of "traditional" CT use versus alternative diagnostic strategies in the acute care setting. A modified Delphi technique was used that included input from emergency physicians, emergency radiologists, medical physicists, and an industry expert to achieve this.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, C. L., Broder, J., Gunn, M. L., Bhargavan-Chatfield, M., Cody, D., Cullison, K., … Sodickson, A. D. (2015). Comparative effectiveness research: Alternatives to “traditional” computed tomography use in the acute care setting. In Academic Emergency Medicine (Vol. 22, pp. 1465–1473). Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free