Development of a population-specific regression equation to estimate total body water in hemodialysis patients

125Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have previously shown that the impedance index (height corrected resistance) is a valid and reliable correlate of total body water (TBW) in hemodialysis patients. We estimated TBW by single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in 3009 in-center hemodialysis patients, and developed an ESRD-specific TBW equation from routinely available demographic and anthropometric variables. The mean ± SD age was 60.5 ± 15.5 years; 47% were female, 47% African-American, and 36% diabetic. Dialysis duration was 3.8 ± 3.7 years. Mean TBW was 40.8 ± 9.3 kg, 56 ± 9% of body weight. A stepwise linear regression equation was fit on a two-thirds random sample, deriving significant parameter estimates for the variables age, gender, height, weight, diabetic status, weight squared, and the cross-products of age and gender, age and weight, gender and weight, and height and weight. The equation was then validated in the remaining one-third sample, and compared with TBW estimates by the Watson and Hume-Weyer formulae. TBW estimated by our equation (40.6 ± 9.3 kg). In contrast, TBW estimated by the Watson (37.0 ± 7.6 kg) and Hume-Weyer (37.9 ± 7.7 kg) formulae underestimated TBW by a mean of 3.5 and 2.6 kg, respectively. A population-specific equation provides superior prediction of TBW in hemodialysis patients. The use of formulae developed and validated in non-uremic populations may result in underestimates of TBW in patients with ESRD, and potentially, overestimates of dialysis dose approximated by the clearance-time to TBW ratio (Kt/V).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chertow, G. M., Lazarus, J. M., Lew, N. L., Ma, L., & Lowrie, E. G. (1997). Development of a population-specific regression equation to estimate total body water in hemodialysis patients. Kidney International, 51(5), 1578–1582. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1997.216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free