Índices de onda P na predição de recorrência de fibrilação atrial após isolamento da veia pulmonar

47Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: P-wave indices are appealing markers for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences post ablation. Objective: This study evaluates the value of P wave indices to predict recurrences post pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods: We selected 198 patients (57 ± 8 years, 150 males) with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI in our hospital. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was used to measure P wave duration in lead II, P wave terminal force (PWTF) in lead V1, P wave axis and dispersion. Results: During a follow-up of 9 ± 3 months, recurrences occurred in 60 (30.3%) patients. The patients that had AF recurrence had longer mean P wave duration (122.9 ± 10.3 vs 104.3 ± 14.2 ms, p < 0.001), larger P wave dispersion (40.7 ± 1.7 ms vs 36.6 ± 3.2 ms, p < 0.001). P wave duration ≥ 125 ms has 60% sensitivity, 90% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 72% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 83.7%, whereas P wave dispersion ≥ 40 ms has 78% sensitivity, 67% specificity, PPV of 51% and NPV of 87.6% 48/66 (72.7%) patients with PWTF ≤ - 0.04 mm/second vs 12/132(9%) with PWTF > -0.04 mm/second showed recurrence of AF (p < 0.001). P wave axis was not different between two groups. On multivariate analysis, P wave indices were not independent from left atrial size and age. Conclusions: P wave duration ≥ 125 ms, P wave dispersion ≥ 40 ms and PWTF in V1 ≤ - 0.04 mm/sec are good clinical predictors of AF recurrences post PVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; however they were not independent from left atrial size and age.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salah, A., Zhou, S., Liu, Q., & Yan, H. (2013). Índices de onda P na predição de recorrência de fibrilação atrial após isolamento da veia pulmonar. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 101(6), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20130214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free