Reactions to Reese: Lord, Let Us Laud and Lament

  • Poling A
  • Byrne T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Comments on the article by H. W. Reese (see record 1997-05919-001) regarding behavior analysis and physiology. The authors disagree with Reese's criticism of pseudophysiology, his concept of "products of physiology," and his analysis of the behavioral functions of those products. They believe that understanding what is known concerning the relation between physiology and behavior is requisite for behavior analysts to interact profitably with other scientists, and that the techniques of behavior analysis are well suited for exploring what are fundamentally physiological questions. Though behavior analysts need not study physiological processes, there is no fundamental reason why they should not do so. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2002 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poling, A., & Byrne, T. (1996). Reactions to Reese: Lord, Let Us Laud and Lament. The Behavior Analyst, 19(1), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392742

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free