Implementing chemicals policy: Leaders or laggards?

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prioritization of regulatory agency resources remains a key issue in the management of industrial pollution. This is likely to become increasingly important as a new EC chemicals policy is implemented and measures are introduced to achieve the OSPAR zero emissions target. The Environment Agency (England and Wales) has updated the Operator Pollution and Risk Assessment (OPRA) scheme, but it still includes no quantitative measurement of operator attitudes towards environmental regulation. This is important because regulated firms' attitudes are known to affect regulatory behaviour. This study explores the attitudes of environmental managers from 142 chemical sector companies regulated under Integrated Pollution Control. Analysis of responses from a questionnaire survey revealed a number of regulatory typologies. A 'conservative' cluster exhibited satisfaction with the current regulatory system and rejected change. 'Progressive' cluster members recognized shortcomings and welcomed change. This methodology could be used alongside OPRA to support decisions necessary to prioritize regulatory resources. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richards, J. P., Glegg, G. A., & Cullinane, S. (2004). Implementing chemicals policy: Leaders or laggards? Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(6), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free