Exploring the determinants of confidence in the bat-and-ball problem

12Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

People often fail to solve deceptively simple mathematical problems, a tendency popularly demonstrated by the bat-and-ball problem. The most prominent explanation of this finding is that, to spare cognitive effort, people substitute the difficult task with an easier one, without being aware of the substitution. Despite this latter assumption, recent studies have found decreased levels of post-decision confidence ratings when people gave the answer of an easier calculation, suggesting that people are sensitive to their errors. In the current study, we investigated a mechanism that might be responsible for such a decrease in people's confidence ratings when they make errors: their attempts to make certain that their answer is correct (verification) and the perceived level of task difficulty (verifiability). We found that these two factors predicted people's confidence, suggesting that people's self-assessment of the perceived task difficulty and of their attempt to verify their response might determine their confidence. Implication for current models of post-decision confidence on reasoning problems is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szollosi, A., Bago, B., Szaszi, B., & Aczel, B. (2017). Exploring the determinants of confidence in the bat-and-ball problem. Acta Psychologica, 180, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free