Comparison of multi-class and binary classification machine learning models in identifying strong gravitational lenses

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Typically, binary classification lens-finding schemes are used to discriminate between lens candidates and non-lenses. However, these models often suffer from substantial false-positive classifications. Such false positives frequently occur due to images containing objects such as crowded sources, galaxies with arms, and also images with a central source and smaller surrounding sources. Therefore, a model might confuse the stated circumstances with an Einstein ring. It has been proposed that by allowing such commonly misclassified image types to constitute their own classes, machine learning models will more easily be able to learn the difference between images that contain real lenses, and images that contain lens imposters. Using Hubble Space Telescope images, in the F814W filter, we compare the usage of binary and multi-class classification models applied to the lens finding task. From our findings, we conclude there is not a significant benefit to using the multi-class model over a binary model. We will also present the results of a simple lens search using a multi-class machine learning model, and potential new lens candidates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teimoorinia, H., Toyonaga, R. D., Fabbro, S., & Bottrell, C. (2020). Comparison of multi-class and binary classification machine learning models in identifying strong gravitational lenses. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132(1010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ab747b

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free