Abstract
Hypothesis testing using a frequentist approach is the mainstay of biostatistics and forms the foundation for assessing the significance of study results. This classical method has well-understood advantages as it determines whether data are statistically improbable and provides a threshold (ie, the P value) for delineating significance. Alternative statistical approaches have been proposed, including Bayesian analysis. This technique incorporates a prior probability as to what is already known clinically with the observed data. It is important for otolaryngologists to understand the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 approaches to conduct the most appropriate analyses.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shin, J. J., & Zurakowski, D. (2017, December 1). Null Hypotheses, Interval Estimation, and Bayesian Analysis. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817728898
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.