Null Hypotheses, Interval Estimation, and Bayesian Analysis

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Hypothesis testing using a frequentist approach is the mainstay of biostatistics and forms the foundation for assessing the significance of study results. This classical method has well-understood advantages as it determines whether data are statistically improbable and provides a threshold (ie, the P value) for delineating significance. Alternative statistical approaches have been proposed, including Bayesian analysis. This technique incorporates a prior probability as to what is already known clinically with the observed data. It is important for otolaryngologists to understand the advantages and disadvantages of these 2 approaches to conduct the most appropriate analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shin, J. J., & Zurakowski, D. (2017, December 1). Null Hypotheses, Interval Estimation, and Bayesian Analysis. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817728898

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free