NATIONAL RECONCILIATION IN THE AGE OF NEW SOCIAL MEDIA: The War on Silence in the Tunisian Truth Commission’s Facebook-Mediated Public Hearings

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

At first glance, there seems to be a shared mission between social media’s promise of increased dissemination of information and truth commissions’ commitment to truth, granting victims a voice, and safeguarding people’s right to information—which would suggest that the rise of the former could only empower the latter. This study suggests otherwise. I argue that social media can impede truth commissions’ liberal vision that celebrates “speaking” as synonymous with “healing” and hails publicizing victims’ testimonies as key to facilitating national reconciliation. Through a study of the Tunisian Truth and Dignity Commission’s Facebook-mediated public hearings, I analyze these platforms’ algorithmic mode of content circulation and argue that one of its less analyzed features is its “war on silence.” While “voice” has been celebrated and silence decried in human rights discourse, I analyze silence as a “gap in knowledge” and argue for its role in forging empathetic publics and mediating reconciliation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheet, D. (2023). NATIONAL RECONCILIATION IN THE AGE OF NEW SOCIAL MEDIA: The War on Silence in the Tunisian Truth Commission’s Facebook-Mediated Public Hearings. Cultural Anthropology, 38(3), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.14506/CA38.3.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free