Abstract
The identity, legitimacy, and sustainability of international business (IB) as a research field are at stake. IB is being overtaken by the evolution of industries and technology, and critical voices challenge its distinctiveness and value. We identify IB’s ambiguous conceptual space, articulate the roots of the problem, and suggest a perspective for re-legitimizing the discipline. Specifically, we contend that redrawing legitimate knowledge boundaries for IB requires an ontological shift. In this respect, we promote a focus on the processual constitution of international entities across time and a reconceptual-ization of IB as the amalgamation of local and international forces. The perspective we advocate aims to counterbalance the disciplinary tautology suffered by current IB conceptualizations and to open up the discussion on boundary identification in the field.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Poulis, K., & Poulis, E. (2018). International business as disciplinary tautology: An ontological perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0050
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.