High intake of milk, but not meat, decreases bone turnover in prepubertal boys after 7 days

24Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short-term effect of a high milk and a high meat intake, identical in protein amount, on bone turnover during prepuberty. Setting: A University Department. Design and Subjects: From 28, randomly recruited, 8-year-old boys, first 14 were assigned to the milk group and next 14 to the meat group. In each group, 12 boys finished the dietary intervention. Intervention: Milk (1.5 l/day) and meat (250 g/d), both containing ∼ 53 g of protein, were given together with the habitual diet for 7 days. At baseline and day-7, serum osteocalcin (s-OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (s-BAP) and C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (s-CTX) were measured (immunoassay) and dietary intake was estimated (a 3-day weighted food record). Results: Baseline s-OC, s-BAP and s-CTX were not significantly different between the groups. After 7 days, the average protein intake increased in both groups by 47.5 g; the milk group had higher (P<0.0001) calcium intake; s-OC and s-CTX decreased (P≤0.04) in the milk group (-30.9%; -18.7%, respectively) compared with the meat group (+6.4%; -1.0%, respectively) and s-BAP decreased (P = 0.06) both in the milk (-3.9%) and the meat group (-7.5%). Conclusions: At the equal protein intake, milk, but not meat, decreased bone turnover in prepubertal boys after 7 days. This effect was probably due to some milk-derived compounds, rather than to the total protein intake. Future studies should elucidate the mechanism(s) of milk-related decline of bone turnover and its relevance for peak bone mass during growth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budek, A. Z., Hoppe, C., Michaelsen, K. F., & Mølgaard, C. (2007). High intake of milk, but not meat, decreases bone turnover in prepubertal boys after 7 days. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61(8), 957–962. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free