The right to the truth in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: An analysis from the perspective of theories of justice

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article analyses the right to the truth in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) in the light of theories of justice. The first part argues that, although the concept of transitional justice cannot be assimilated to any existing theory of justice, it can be defined as a multidimensional concept that combines various elements of those theories. After analysing the extent to which these elements are reflected in the right to the truth defined in the jurisprudence of the IACtHR, the article emphasises some limits of the Court’s conceptualisation, especially the fact that it ignores the procedural dimension of justice. Therefore, the conclusion makes the case for democratic deliberation, which invites us to rethink the role of courts in the construction of a narrative about the past.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Druliolle, V. (2022). The right to the truth in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: An analysis from the perspective of theories of justice. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 12(5), 1034–1052. https://doi.org/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free