Abstract
Background: The balanced crystalloids have become a substitute for saline for fluid resuscitation. Some studies have investigated the clinical effect and adverse event of differently balanced crystalloids, but they have no consistent conclusions. This study aims to assess and compare the effect of differently balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill and non-critically ill patients using network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) will be searched from inception to April 2018. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effect and adverse event of balanced crystalloids. Risk of bias assessment of the included RCTs will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. A Bayesian NMA will be performed using R software. GRADE will be used to explore the quality of evidence. Results: The results of this NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusion: This NMA will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to assess the effect of differently balanced crystalloids.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ma, P., Wang, B., Zhang, J., Shen, X., Yu, L., & Dou, X. (2018, December 1). Balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill and non-critically ill patients: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analyses. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013683
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.