Comparative performance of modified solid and compositewood samples in standard tests

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The properties of several modified wood products were evaluated using North American standards to provide comparative data for architects seeking to use these materials. In general, modified wood products had lower moisture uptakes and less shrinkage than unmodified products. Acetylated materials were highly resistant to fungal decay, whereas thermally modified and furfurylated materials were classified as decay resistant. All materials were susceptible to mold, although the nonacetylated moisture-resistant medium-density fiberboard was most susceptible. Thermally modified and furfurylated materials were similar in mold susceptibility to untreated radiata pine sapwood, whereas acetylated materials appeared to be more mold resistant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rose, R., Leavengood, S., & Morrell, J. J. (2019). Comparative performance of modified solid and compositewood samples in standard tests. Forest Products Journal, 69(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-19-00023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free