Impact of conversion on short and long-term outcome in Laparoscopic Resection of curable Colorectal Cancer

46Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Long-term outcome of patients following conversion during laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is not often reported. Recent data suggest a negative impact of conversion on long-term survival. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of conversion on the perioperative outcome and on long-term survival in patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for curable colorectal cancer. Methods: Evaluation of our prospective in-hospital collected data of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for curable colorectal cancer over a 5-year period. Long-term data were collected from our outpatient's clinic data and personal contact when necessary. Results: During the study period, 175 patients were operated on laparoscopically for curable colon cancer (stage I-III). Mean follow-up was 33_18 months with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. For various reasons, 25 patients (14.4%) had to be converted to open surgery. Short-term outcome revealed a trend towards longer operations, a higher rate of surgical complications, and a longer hospital stay in the converted group. Five-year, Kaplan-Meier, disease-free analysis was worse for converted patients. Overall survival did not differ between the 2 groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that conversion and AJCC stage were independent risk factors for recurrence. Conclusions: Conversion in laparoscopic surgery for curable colorectal cancer is associated with a worse perioperative outcome and worse disease-free survival. © 2011 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, I., Greenberg, R., Itah, R., Inbar, R., Schneebaum, S., & Avital, S. (2011). Impact of conversion on short and long-term outcome in Laparoscopic Resection of curable Colorectal Cancer. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 15(2), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13071180406439

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free