Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae

9Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Four hundred forty-one clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae were identified in parallel by using the API Rapid E 4-h and the API 20E overnight procedures (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.). The results obtained by using the API Rapid E were compared with those obtained by using the API 20E. Discrepancies were resolved by using standard biochemicals. The API 20E identified 98.9% (436 of 441) of the isolates without the use of additional biochemicals and was found to be correct in each case of a discrepancy among the 436 isolates. The API Rapid E gave the same identification as the API 20E for 94.0% (410 of 436) of the isolates, misidentified 3.0% (13 of 436), and gave a correct but low-selectivity answer for the remaining 3.0% (13 of 436). The API Rapid E is a suitable alternative for the rapid identification of the Enterobacteriaceae.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Overman, T. L., Plumley, D., Overman, S. B., & Goodman, N. L. (1985). Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 21(4), 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.21.4.542-545.1985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free