A cross-cultural colour-naming study. Part I: Using an unconstrained method

74Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Colour naming by panels of British and Taiwanese subjects (speaking English and Mandarin, respectively) was used to study colour categorization, and the results applied to investigate differences of usage between the two languages. Fifty British and 40 Chinese subjects took part in experiments using an unconstrained method with 200 ISCC-NBS colour samples. Data analysis was performed to calculate the frequency and codability of each colour name in each group and subgroup. These names were then grouped using 7-category and 4-category methods to find the culture and gender differences. It was confirmed that the 11 basic names found by Berlin and Kay were the most widely used for both languages. The results showed a close agreement between the two languages in terms of colour categories, but a large discrepancy in the use of secondary names due to cultural differences. The cross-cultural comparison revealed a clear pattern of the linkage between language and concepts of colour. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, H., Luo, M. R., MacDonald, L. W., & Tarrant, A. W. S. (2001). A cross-cultural colour-naming study. Part I: Using an unconstrained method. Color Research and Application, 26(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6378(200102)26:1<40::AID-COL5>3.0.CO;2-X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free