Negotiating Your Way Through the Vigilance Agreement Maze—is There a Better Way?

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The pharmacovigilance agreements (PVA) landscape has evolved over recent decades with rapid growth in the number and complexity of partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions between pharmaceutical companies. Simultaneously there has been increasing scrutiny from regulatory authorities. Detailed regulations and guidance are lacking in this domain; hence companies have developed their own processes, templates, and tools, which have headed in different directions. Where feasible, marketing authorization holders (MAHs) have written contracts based on mutually understood requirements. Currently, MAHs are striving to find optimal solutions that safeguard patients, and in turn, support pharmacovigilance compliance. Through the TransCelerate BioPharma consortium MAHs are seeking simplification and efficiencies, to optimize the process of developing contractual agreements for pharmacovigilance. A survey of MAHs confirmed the perceptions above, and the need for efficient solutions to help navigate through the maze of complexity. The authors have led the development of tools and techniques to enable partnership between MAHs, and ultimately to support patient safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corbel-Ecalard, C., Kilgour-Christie, J., Trun, W., & Lewis, D. J. (2023). Negotiating Your Way Through the Vigilance Agreement Maze—is There a Better Way? Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 57(5), 1017–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00513-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free