Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcinerurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone. © 2007 The Authors.
CITATION STYLE
Cruzado, J. M., Bestard, O., Riera, L., Torras, J., Gil-Vernet, S., Serón, D., … Grinyó, J. M. (2007). Immunosuppression for dual kidney transplantation with marginal organs: The old is better yet. American Journal of Transplantation, 7(3), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01671.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.