Overdiagnosis or not? 2017 ACC/AHA high blood pressure clinical practice guideline: Consequences of intellectual conflict of interest

11Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

American Heart Association/the American College of Cardiology and nine other professional organizations have issued a new hypertension clinical practice guideline (CPG) on November 2017, which has lowered the hypertension threshold to 130/80 mmHg. American Academy of Family Medicine has decided to not endorse this new CPG for various reasons including flaws in CPG development process and a limited additional benefit for lower treatment targets. The major concern was intellectual conflict of interest (COI). Substantial weight was given to SPRINT trial, which provided the basis for the recommended change in blood pressure targets. It is a serious intellectual COI that the Chair of the SPRINT trial steering committee was commissioned as chair of the guideline panel. The new threshold would lead to 46 percent of the U.S. adult population being categorized as having hypertension, while using the previous threshold that figure would be 32 percent. Should we call this change as overdiagnosis?.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miyazaki, K. (2018, July 1). Overdiagnosis or not? 2017 ACC/AHA high blood pressure clinical practice guideline: Consequences of intellectual conflict of interest. Journal of General and Family Medicine. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.176

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free