Comparison of nicardipine, diltiazem and verapamil for controlling the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation

49Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared the efficacy of three calcium channel blockers, nicardipine, diltiazem and verapamil, in attenuating the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in 60 normotensive patients (ASA I) undergoing rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone and fentanyl. We also examined whether or not these blockers inhibited catecholamine release induced by intubation. The patients were allocated to one of four groups (n = 15 for each): saline (control), nicardipine 30μgkg-1, diltiazem 0.2mgkg-1 or verapamil 0.1 mg kg-1. Verapamil and the three other drugs were administered 45 s and 60 s before the start of direct laryngoscopy, respectively, in a double-dummy design. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 4 mg kg-1 i.v. and fentanyl 2μgkg-1 i.v. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with vecuronium 0.2mgkg-1. During anaesthesia, ventilation was assisted or controlled with 1% isoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Laryngoscopy lasting 30 s was attempted 2 min after administration of thiopentone and vecuronium. Patients receiving saline exhibited significant increases in systolic and diastolic arterial pressures (AP), heart rate (HR) and plasma concentrations of catecholamines associated with tracheal intubation. The increase in AP was attenuated in patients treated with any calcium channel blocker. The greatest effect was elicited by verapamil, which attenuated the increase in HR, although nicardipine seemed to enhance tachycardia. All three drugs failed to suppress the increase in plasma catecholamine concentrations in response to tracheal intubation. These findings suggest that bolus injection of verapamil 0.1mgkg-1 was a more effective method of controlling hypertension and tachycardia associated with intubation than diltiazem 0.2mgkg-1 or nicardipine 30μgkg-1, and that these prophylactic effects were not caused by inhibition of the catecholamine response.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikawa, K., Nishina, K., Maekawa, N., & Obara, H. (1996). Comparison of nicardipine, diltiazem and verapamil for controlling the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 76(2), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/76.2.221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free