Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate

269Citations
Citations of this article
176Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We attempt to recover an n-dimensional vector observed in white noise, where n is large and the vector is known to be sparse, but the degree of sparsity is unknown. We consider three different ways of defining sparsity of a vector: using the fraction of nonzero terms; imposing power-law decay bounds on the ordered entries; and controlling the ℓ p norm for p small. We obtain a procedure which is asymptotically minimax for ℓ r loss, simultaneously throughout a range of such sparsity classes. The optimal procedure is a data-adaptive thresholding scheme, driven by control of the false discovery rate (FDR). FDR control is a relatively recent innovation in simultaneous testing, ensuring that at most a certain expected fraction of the rejected null hypotheses will correspond to false rejections. In our treatment, the FDR control parameter q n also plays a determining role in asymptotic minimaxity. If q = lim q n ∈[0, 1/2] and also q n > γ/ log(n), we get sharp asymptotic minimaxity, simultaneously, over a wide range of sparse parameter spaces and loss functions. On the other hand, q = lim q n ∈ (1/2, 1] forces the risk to exceed the minimax risk by a factor growing with q. To our knowledge, this relation between ideas in simultaneous inference and asymptotic decision theory is new. Our work provides a new perspective on a class of model selection rules which has been introduced recently by several authors. These new rules impose complexity penalization of the form 2 · log(potential model size/ actual model sizes). We exhibit a close connection with FDR-controlling procedures under stringent control of the false discovery rate. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abramovich, F., Benjamini, Y., Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (2006). Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate. Annals of Statistics, 34(2), 584–653. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free