Metformin versus laparoscopic ovarian drilling in clomiphene- and insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome

35Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare the hormonal-metabolic profiles and reproductive outcomes in clomiphene-resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance between women receiving metformin and those undergoing laparoscopic ovarian drilling. Methods: A total of 110 eligible participants were randomly allocated to diagnostic laparoscopy plus metformin therapy (group 1, n = 55) or laparoscopic ovarian drilling (group 2, n = 55). The t test was used for mean comparisons of hormonal-metabolic parameters and OGTT values before and after treatment. The χ2 test was used for comparisons of ovulation, pregnancy, and abortion rates. Results: Groups 1 and 2 showed a significant decline in testosterone, insulin-like growth factor-1 (P < 0.001 vs P < 0.001), and luteinizing hormone (P < 0.05 vs P < 0.001), while the glucose to insulin ratio was significantly increased (P < 0.001 vs P < 0.05) compared with baseline. Group 2 patients had more regular cycles and higher rates of ovulation and pregnancy compared with group 1: 76.4% [42/55] vs 58.2% [32/55], P < 0.04; 50.8% [131/258] vs 33.5% [94/281], P < 0.001; and 38.2% [21/55] vs 20.0% [11/55], P < 0.03, respectively. The difference in the early abortion rate between the groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Although metformin results in a better attenuation of insulin resistance, laparoscopic ovarian drilling is associated with higher rates of ovulation and pregnancy. © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamed, H. O., Hasan, A. F., Ahmed, O. G., & Ahmed, M. A. (2010). Metformin versus laparoscopic ovarian drilling in clomiphene- and insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free