Microbial identification using DNA target amplification and sequencing: Clinical utility and impact on patient management

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is increasingly used in patients with culture-negative infections; however, few studies have assessed the diagnostic utility of this test in this context. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had clinical specimens sent for broad-range PCR, aiming to evaluate performance and determine impact on patient management. Organisms were identified in 21/71 samples. High numbers of polymorphonuclear leukocytes on Gram stain (odds ratio [OR], 4.17; P = .04) and acute inflammation on histopathology (OR, 5.69; P = .02) were significantly associated with a positive result. Management was altered in 18 patients, 11 with positive and 7 with negative results. Overall, broad-range PCR assay had the highest impact in patients with microscopic evidence of inflammation. Physicians ordering this complex, difficult to interpret, and expensive test should carefully consider all available clinical information on an individualized basis to optimize its performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Basein, T., Gardiner, B. J., Andujar Vazquez, G. M., Joel Chandranesan, A. S., Rabson, A. R., Doron, S., & Snydman, D. R. (2018). Microbial identification using DNA target amplification and sequencing: Clinical utility and impact on patient management. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free