Critérios sociais e éticos de priorização de pacientes: Uma pesquisa a estudantes e profissionais de saúde em Portugal

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This qualitative/quantitative study examines the ethical dilemma of microallocation of health resources. It seeks to identify and compare the opinion of two groups in Portuguese society – students and health professionals – on the importance of personal characteristics of patients at the moment of prioritizing them and if the choices can be explained by bioethical references of a utilitarian or deontological nature. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire administered to a sample of 180 students and 60 health professionals. Faced with hypothetical emergency scenarios, the respondents had to choose between two patients (distinguished by: age, gender, social responsibility, economic and employment situation, harmful health behaviors and criminal record), duly selecting who to treat and then justifying their choice. The results suggest the existence of differences in choices between the two groups, with health professionals revealing they are less prepared to accept the use of social criteria in a context of scarce resources and co-existence of utilitarian and deontological criteria, with a predominance of efficiency on the part of health professionals and equity on the part of students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinho, M. M. (2016). Critérios sociais e éticos de priorização de pacientes: Uma pesquisa a estudantes e profissionais de saúde em Portugal. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 21(12), 3917–3926. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152112.17072015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free