Quality assessment of inhospital patients unable to speak who use alternative and extended communication

  • Bandeira F
  • Faria F
  • Araujo E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To implement the use of alternative communication boards in patients hospitalized and unable to communicate by speech. Methods: A descriptive study with a sample of 30 patients hospitalized and unable to communicate by speech. Boards were made with Boardmaker® Software that consists of a graphical database containing Pictorial Communication Symbols. To assess the quality of life of these patients, the Portuguese SF-36, a translated version of the Medical Outcomes Study, was applied before and after the study. Results: We found that all domains of the SF-36 showed changes after the application of communication boards. We observed that the minimum score was assigned to the mental health domain, whereas the most affected and with greatest involvement and least compromise was the overall health status. Conclusion: The quality of life assessment of patients showed improvement with the use of communication boards, demonstrating the importance and necessity of communication between the patient and staff and the patient and family members.RESUMO Objetivo: Implementar o uso de pranchas de comunicação alternativa em pacientes hospitalizados e impossibilitados de se comunicarem pela fala. Métodos: Estudo descritivo com amostra de 30 pacientes hospitalizados e impossibilitados de se comunicarem pela fala. Foram confeccionadas pranchas por intermédio do software Boardmaker® que consiste em um banco de dados gráfico contendo Símbolos de Comunicação Pictórica (Picture Symbols Communication). Para avaliar a qualidade de vida desses pacientes, foi aplicado, antes e após o estudo, o questionário SF-36, versão em português do Medical Outcomes Study traduzido. Resultados: Verificou-se que todos os domínios do SF-36 apresentaram alterações após a aplicação das pranchas de comunicação. Observou-se que a mínima pontuação foi atribuída ao domínio “saúde mental”, sendo o domínio “estado geral de saúde” o mais afetado e com menor comprometimento. Conclusão: A avaliação da qualidade de vida dos pacientes estudados apresentou melhora com o uso das pranchas de comunicação, demonstrando a importância e a necessidade da comunicação entre paciente-equipe e paciente-familiar.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bandeira, F. M., Faria, F. P. de, & Araujo, E. B. de. (2011). Quality assessment of inhospital patients unable to speak who use alternative and extended communication. Einstein (São Paulo), 9(4), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082011ao2083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free