Revisiting the provision of pain neuroscience education: An adjunct intervention for patients but a primary focus of clinician education

44Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Society is mired in a serious health care crisis regarding pain and opioid abuse. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has gained support in the last 20 years as an intervention to help people manage chronic pain. In this Viewpoint, we argue that exercise and movement must be the primary intervention for chronic pain conditions, and that PNE or other adjunctive therapies should only be used if they can foster increased exercise and movement participation. Pain education should be the primary focus of a chronic pain management strategy for students and clinicians. It would help to advance knowledge and skills, and ultimately enhance care and outcomes for patients with chronic pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

LOUW, A., SLUKA, K. A., NIJS, J., COURTNEY, C. A., & ZIMNEY, K. (2021, February 1). Revisiting the provision of pain neuroscience education: An adjunct intervention for patients but a primary focus of clinician education. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. Movement Science Media. https://doi.org/10.2519/JOSPT.2021.9804

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free