Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: History, monophyly and the rejection of paraphyletic taxa

41Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Diatom classification is changing. We briefly discuss the history of diatom classification and comment on some of the most recent systems derived from the analysis of molecular data. Classification is not about "sources" of data, but the recognition of monophyletic groups based on evidence. We note that through recent history, with observations based on light microscopy, electron microscopy and molecular analysis, the creation of paraphyletic groups and their retention has been the tradition, leaving a natural classification of the group wanting. Replacing one paraphyletic system with another is a pointless exercise in authority. Congruence between phylogenetic analysis and classification may yield a dramatic restructuring of the classification of the diatoms, and that has implications for training future diatom researchers. © 2007 British Phycological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, D. M., & Kociolek, J. P. (2007, August). Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: History, monophyly and the rejection of paraphyletic taxa. European Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260701419921

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free