Agronomic and commercial performance of four Spanish carob cultivars

23Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua) shows interesting prospects for some coastal Mediterranean growing areas and is widely used for industrial, agricultural, and ornamental purposes. It can be an alternative crop adapted to part-time farming and can also be used to regenerate vegetation in areas with a mild climate and erosion problems. Four Spanish carob cultivars were examined (Banya de Cabra, Duraio, Matalafera, and Rojal) to determine the one that performed the best for planting new orchards in northeastern Spain (Catalonia). The trees in this rain-fed trial (average rainfall of 500 mm) were planted in 1986 using seedling rootstocks that were budded in 1987. The trees were trained using the free-vase system and were spaced 8 × 9 m (138 trees/ha including 12% pollinators). The results showed that 'Rojal' was the earliest bearing cultivar. However, no significant differences were observed for cumulative pod production 18 years after budding. With respect to cumulative seed yield, 'Duraio' had the highest production (95 kg/tree). The lowest tree vigor (trunk cross-section) was observed in 'Matalafera'. Rojal trees produced the largest pods (average fruit weight of 18.9 g) and lowest seed content (11.8%), while 'Banya de Cabra' and 'Duraio' produced the smallest fruit (weighing 15.3 and 16.2 g, respectively) with the highest seed content (15.2% and 17.3%, respectively). Gum content, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight, was highest in 'Duraio' (56.9%) and was lowest in 'Rojal' (54.1%). Thus, in terms of kernel and pod production, 'Duraio' appeared to be the best-performing female cultivar for planting new carob orchards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tous, J., Romero, A., Hermoso, J. F., Ninot, A., Plana, J., & Batlle, I. (2009). Agronomic and commercial performance of four Spanish carob cultivars. HortTechnology, 19(2), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.19.2.465

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free