Changes in the flow-volume curve according to the degree of stenosis in patients with unilateral main bronchial stenosis

12Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. The shape of the flow-volume (F-V) curve is known to change to showing a prominent plateau as stenosis progresses in patients with tracheal stenosis. However, no study has evaluated changes in the F-V curve according to the degree of bronchial stenosis in patients with unilateral main bronchial stenosis. Methods. We performed an analysis of F-V curves in 29 patients with unilateral bronchial stenosis with the aid of a graphic digitizer between January 2005 and December 2011. Results. The primary diseases causing unilateral main bronchial stenosis were endobronchial tuberculosis (86%), followed by benign bronchial tumor (10%), and carcinoid (3%). All unilateral main bronchial stenoses were classified into one of five grades (I, ≤25%; II, 26%–50%; III, 51%–75%; IV, 76%–90%; V, >90% to near-complete obstruction without ipsilateral lung collapse). A monophasic F-V curve was observed in patients with grade I stenosis and biphasic curves were observed for grade II–IV stenosis. Both monophasic (81%) and biphasic shapes (18%) were observed in grade V stenosis. After standardization of the biphasic shape of the F-V curve, the breakpoints of the biphasic curve moved in the direction of high volume (x-axis) and low flow (y-axis) according to the progression of stenosis. Conclusion. In unilateral bronchial stenosis, a biphasic F-V curve appeared when bronchial stenosis was >25% and disappeared when obstruction was near complete. In addition, the breakpoint moved in the direction of high volume and low flow with the progression of stenosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ko, Y., Yoo, J. G., Yi, C. A., Lee, K. S., Jeon, K., Um, S. W., … Kim, H. (2015). Changes in the flow-volume curve according to the degree of stenosis in patients with unilateral main bronchial stenosis. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 8(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free