Metrics for Phased Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transmission for Institutions of Higher Education: 2022 and beyond

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the nearly 2 years since suspending in-person activities, many institutions of higher education (IHEs) have struggled with returning students, staff, and faculty to campus safely and developed robust mitigation plans, continuing or instituting surveillance testing, and codifying stringent coronavirus disease 2019 codes of conduct. Essential to return-to-campus planning is a strategy for when and how to reduce activities to slow transmission through phased prevention - a strategy for reintroducing nonpharmaceutical interventions and "metering"activities at IHEs based on the levels of community severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission and testing. In this regard, I propose a series of mitigation measures and the metrics for their implementation, color coded and categorized in phases similar to those recommended by the federal and numerous state governments to open nonessential businesses and resume in-person services, and specific where applicable to IHEs that require vaccination and those at which vaccination is optional.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sehgal, N. J. (2022). Metrics for Phased Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transmission for Institutions of Higher Education: 2022 and beyond. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab627

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free