Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venipuncture Decreases the Procedure's Pain and Positively Impacts Patient's Experience: The PRECISE Randomized Clinical Trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to compare patients' experience of pain during ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral venipuncture versus conventional peripheral venipuncture. This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a public university hospital in 2021. Adult patients with indication for intravenous therapy compatible with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) were included: intervention group (IG), US peripheral venipuncture executed by specialist nurses; control group (CG), conventional peripheral venipuncture executed by clinical practice nurses. The primary outcome was patient experience of pain during the procedure and patient experience related to the PIVC placement method. Sixty-four patients were included, 32 for each group. The pain experienced was none-to-mild in the IG for 25 patients (78.1%) and moderate-to-severe in the CG for 21 patients (65.7%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Junges, M., Hansel, L. A., Santos, M. S., Hirakata, V. N., Nascimento Ceratti, R. D., Czerwinski, G. P. V., … Rabelo-Silva, E. R. (2024). Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venipuncture Decreases the Procedure’s Pain and Positively Impacts Patient’s Experience: The PRECISE Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 47(3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000542

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free